I've felt that sisvinit is really all you need for a laptop or desktop, or possibly
even a stand alone server.
But, after looking around, I took the path of least resistance and began using distros
that use systemd.
Systemd has a lot of issues. It's monolithic. They went and built something that is
very flexible, and then used it a way that hardly utilizes it. It is way more than
someone with a laptop, desktop, or server really needs. It solves a problem that is
really only a problem for someone who has lots of systems to maintain each of which may
have different configurations. Unfortunately, they didn't make this as easy as it
should be; see not using flexibility previouly mentioned.
It does get around some of the awkwardness of rc.local, for example. If only I could get
it to work. That was an issue with rc.local too,as I recall.
I'm thinking that if I get some time, I'll play around with it.
On Sat, Nov 08, 2025 at 07:09:03AM -0800, Charles Polisher wrote:
On 11/7/25 12:45, Brian E. Lavender wrote:
Install Fedora 43 from a clean install and
systemd should work fine. Is
Slackware still on non systemd?
Brian
Slackware is still running on sysvinit. Years of
experience with Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu, CentOS,
Red Hat, FreeBSD, ... haven't has a problem with
sysvinit, have spent dozens of hours "supporting"
systemd. I haven't experienced any tangible benefit,
but from previous posts, and private conversations
on this topic, you do. Could it be because you're
a laptop user? I believe that laptops would be
ideal for me, except that the keyboards are always
a non-starter. I haven't ever tried a laptop
keyboard that didn't make my fingers feel retarded.
--
Chuck Polisher
_______________________________________________
Lug-nuts mailing list -- lug-nuts(a)bigbrie.com
To unsubscribe send an email to lug-nuts-leave(a)bigbrie.com
--
-Gary
It is a simple thing to make things complex,
a complex thing to make things simple.