Well, I never heard of it and I don't care for Chromium. Are you using it? I forwarded my reply to the list because I thought it was your intention to reply there.
-Gary
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 06:52:25AM -0700, bob r wrote:
> Gary,
> Is there any reason why you have not tried the Brave browser yet?
> Bob
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 6:38 PM Gary <saclug(a)garymcglinn.com> wrote:
>
> > I went to the Volkswagen site and my Firefox 84 had some problems. So, I
> > installed Firefox 106. The widgets/trim are ugly, but it didn't have any
> > issues on the Volkswagen site. Interestingly to me, the page layout was
> > completely different. Not sure what has come online recently as far as
> > what browsers have to support, but there is definitely something
> > substantial that is new.
> >
> > -Gary
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 06:36:07AM -0700, Gary wrote:
> > > OK, I've seen enough. In palemoon the "learn more" button on
> > Wolkswagens web site doesn't work. It doesn't seem to be recognized.
> > Works fine in old Firefox.
> > >
> > > -Gary
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 05:47:55AM -0700, Gary wrote:
> > > > Any thoughts on the Pale Moon web browser?
> > > >
> > > > I was looking around on Honda's web site and they complained about my
> > web browser being out of date. On that VM, its Firefox 84. I clicked on
> > "learn more" hoping that Honda would tell me exactly why they wanted me to
> > upgrade. It's not a bank, after all, and they offered me browser options.
> > > >
> > > > Admittedly, I live under a rock. But, I had never heard of Pale
> > Moon. I went to their home page and am going to give it a try.
> > > >
> > > > I resist browser upgardes because they often change the layout, for no
> > apparent reason. And, the new "features" are often things I don't like.
> > Such as storing a bunch on info on my browser so they don't have to (which
> > I suspect may be Honda's motive). So, if I was going to have to deal with
> > I new layout anyhow, I decided to go for broke and try something actually
> > new.
> > > >
> > > > Security? Its a Honda site. Unless they want me to protect against
> > malware from them, I don't get it.
> > > >
> > > > -Gary
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Lug-nuts mailing list -- lug-nuts(a)bigbrie.com
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to lug-nuts-leave(a)bigbrie.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Lug-nuts mailing list -- lug-nuts(a)bigbrie.com
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to lug-nuts-leave(a)bigbrie.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lug-nuts mailing list -- lug-nuts(a)bigbrie.com
> > To unsubscribe send an email to lug-nuts-leave(a)bigbrie.com
> >
Hello list,
Finally have working firewall rules analysis code up
& running. This turns out to be a hard problem!
A lot of people have worked out the math, but there
are a ton of picky obstacles to applying them to real
sets of iptables rules. I hope to flesh out the code
over the next few months and am hoping for a release
(public open source) soon.
--
Charles Polisher
Hey Everyone,
I passed my check ride this last Friday for private pilot! woo hoo. This
has been what I call "Curiosity killed the cat adventure.", in the
figurative sense of course. ;-)
It was all partly inspired by work with Spark/Ada while I was at Sac State
and few guest lectures I gave to the CSC 201 class at Sac State on
Spark/Ada revolving around the implementation of Spark/Ada in the C130J
upgrades. While I found the use of Spark/Ada interesting in the C130J, I
couldn't help wondering what more is involved with the aircraft. So, I
took pilot training lessons! Well, it has been a lot of work. I can fly
a Cessna 172 now! It's not quite a C130J, but it sure gives that hands
on feel!
Here is an interesting paper!
https://www.sigada.org/ada_letters/dec2000/chapman-paper.pdf
Brian
--
Brian Lavender
http://www.brie.com/brian/
"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other
way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies."
Professor C. A. R. Hoare
The 1980 Turing award lecture
I applied security updates to the server and I just want to make sure it
still works.
--
Brian Lavender
http://www.brie.com/brian/
"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other
way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies."
Professor C. A. R. Hoare
The 1980 Turing award lecture
It looks like I've managed to recover almost everything. Gparted's disk/partition recovery option worked really well. I don't know if or how it found any superblocks, but it built a loopback /tmp that was just golden.
It took 4 days to run but hey, it was the weekend.
The KVM/qemu files had to be edited quite a but due to the passage of versions/time. And aqemu won't run, but I think this is a Fedora 36 bug.
I'm glad almost everything was in VM's.
I used xxd and gawk to do some carving, but its nice that I won't have to grok all that stuff. Although since I split my RAID1, I'm going to keep the old info around and may play with it some just for fun.
Thanks for all the support, moral and otherwise.
I'm going to spend some time now and come up with a more sane and secure set up. Something I should probably due more than once every decade.
-Gary
I'm looking into locking down ssh some more. It seems that google
provides a PAM module to enable a one time password as part of two
factor authentication.
But changing sshd.comfig to have:
AuthenticationMethods publickey,password
Would require both a password and a key. Since I'm in no hurry to get
Google involved, I thought I might give it a try.
Anyone have any thoughts or played around with this?
-Gary
There may be. But I doubt if many apply to me. However, on a whim, I
installed Fedora 36 on the new drive and it works great. It's possible
that there was some other issue that was causing me difficulty in
upgrading. One prime candidate is operator error. Be that as it may, I
am now working on getting things working under Fedora 36.
I did some reading on UEFI and I have lots of philosopical
disagreements, primarily the same one I always have: It solves a problem
that shouldn't or doesn't exist and it is unnecessarily complex. Is
this really the wave of the future? I notice my Fedora 36 install
didn't use it. Apparently the NSA thinks it is a good idea. They go
all google eyed and mushy over secure boot. On their
page they have a "call for action" and a disclaimer that they aren't
making a recommendation within 3 adjacent paragraphs.
UEFI looks like a WinTel boondoggle to me. Putting a simulator of
Snoopy flying his dog house in a spreadsheet just has to be a good idea.
Apparently the NSA is now the old NSA calld SIGNT and the new NSA called
CSS. I don't know how this all relates to DHS.
-Gary
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 02:46:23PM -0700, Brian E. Lavender wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 09:39:34AM -0700, saclug(a)garymcglinn.com wrote:
> > My experience with the upgrade treadmill is that it is a waste of time.
> > By its own admission (if a concept can have that) the new versions will
> > have issues and you need to upgrade. If the issues with an older
> > version don't affect you, then it is perfectly fine to use it. Why
> > upgrade and risk the fact that the new issues will affect your use case.
> > The developers for Fedora 13 were no smarter or dumber than the
> > developers who are writing Fedora 36. Or pick your distro of choice.
>
> There are probably a boat load of known vulnerabilities in F13. It's
> probably a script kitty winter wonderland, depending upon what you have
> installed/running! If you you want software that is secure proof, you
> have to run something like "Ironsides", written using SPARK/Ada.
>
> https://ironsides.martincarlisle.com/
>
> Beyon that, the best is to keep patching on a stable distro that doesn't
> have API changes, or minimal changes.
>
> Brian
>
> --
> Brian Lavender
> http://www.brie.com/brian/
>
> "There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
> make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other
> way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies."
>
> Professor C. A. R. Hoare
> The 1980 Turing award lecture
> _______________________________________________
> Lug-nuts mailing list -- lug-nuts(a)bigbrie.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to lug-nuts-leave(a)bigbrie.com
----- End forwarded message -----
Thanks for all the helpful information and comments.
My 'new'/replacement system arrived. It's a refurbed Dell with Windows
10 installed. My original plan was just to install a VM in Windows,
until I did the actual set up. It comes with a keystroke logger. Wow.
And they really want to improve your user experience by collenting a lot
of information and sending you a lot of stuff and giving you rewards.
I know you can "turn it off", but I never believe these claims. That's
why I have Google send me my timeline once a month. At least that way I
have some idea of what they are tracking.
Gparted worked pretty well. I like to use good old standard partitions,
so of course Windows uses 4 primaries. I deleted the recovery partition
and resized the main Windows partition and had a decent amount of space.
I burnt a Fedora XFCE disk and off to the races.
The install went fine. But I had remembered that during some installs
in the past there were more options/questions about bootloaded config.
It just installed grub2. I did a custom standard partition and started
with it's "default" suggestion, which has no swap space. After making
adjustments and adding swap and /var and configing users, the install
went without a hitch.
Now I have a system that boots into Fedora 36 just fine, which is all I
need. I can begin to figure out how to lock the system down and what to
bring in/set up to regain my old setup.
Doing the switch to boot from the disk was interesting. It seems like
Dell's BIOS is a little bit out of control. It's redundant and
unnecssarily complex. There are two hotkeys F2 and F12 and you have to
use them both. According to Dell's own web site, each BIOS is
'customized' to specific hardware. What turning off boot security and
turning on legacy boot actually do apparently varies a lot. I had to do
that to boot into the live OS and actually do the install.
Apparently Dell believes that difficulting in performing a task is a
type of security.
I decided to explore dual boot. I have heard for years that Windows and
Linux don't play well. But, an easy test was just to exit out of grub,
which then dumps you into Windows bootloader. This worked fine, but the
boot option to start windows simply doesn't work.
In looking into adding Windows boot to grub, it should be very easy.
Just run os-prober and then update-grub and magically you're done. These
are instructions for a Debian based system. I have to do some
translation for Fedora and update-grub becomes mkconfig-grub.
But it doesn't work.
It is interesting though that the Linux world is mostly Debian for the
'home' user and more Fedora for the more enterprise folks. No one is
going to dual boot their enterprise server, so there is no info. I did
find some interesting grub menuitems to try. But I might just abandon
the dual boot, because if it breaks when I'm in Windowsland, a distinct
possibility, I won't have any tools. Well I'd have the live CD.
But in addition to Windows and Linux not playing well together at boot
time, it seems the UEFI and Legacy don't play well together either. I
was surpised to find that Fedora 36 is a Legacy boot and Windows is a
UEFI.
Just for your entertainment. More reading for me.
And just one bug so far in Fedora or maybe it's Firefox:Firefox won't
play any videos. It just tells me the video is unavalable. I don't use
this system for that, but it is curious.
-Gary