The only thing I found in settings was tracking. I changed it to custom and unchecked everything. It always fails at the login screen. Either before or after I enter my credentials.
Other pages work fine.
Anyone using Firefox?
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 01:01:04PM -0600, Linus Sphinx wrote:
> Upgrade to a 64 bit virus. Anything in F12/errors? Maybe it's the web page
> cross domain or something and firefox has upgraded their security model.
> Sandwich menu button->settings->security and put it in stupid mode, scary
> but it might work.
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:35 PM Gary <saclug(a)garymcglinn.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't really get on the upgrade treadmill. I've been running Firefox 84
> > on Fedora 23 or something for awhile. Its in a VM I had a system issue
> > with the host and had to do a reinstall and upgraded to fc 36. Everything
> > was fine, running my fc 23 VM's on a fc 36 host. I'm on a different VM, my
> > "fun" VM as I write this, which also runs Firefox 84 on fc 23 with no
> > problems. I'll upgrage at some point.
> >
> > The VM with the issues is my "finance" VM. I use it for my credit cards
> > and banking and all that. Banks started to complain about my Firefox 84,
> > so I tried to upgrade to 113. It crashes. A lot. So, I built a new VM
> > with fc 38. And installed Firefox 115. It crashes almost immediately.
> > But I was able to get some forensics. Its complaining that it is sending a
> > 64 bit code to a subsystem that "doesn't support it". Implying that there
> > is a 32 bit library somewhere.
> >
> > I sort of do need to log in to banks and all that. Any thoughs or
> > suggestions? It seems really unlikely that there would be a 32 bit library
> > somewhere.
> >
> > Desktop browsers and Firefox are getting increasingly less mindshare. Is
> > this just EOL thrashing?
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > As you may have guessed, the hardware is pretty old, but I don't see where
> > that would be an issue with this.
> >
> > -Gary
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lug-nuts mailing list -- lug-nuts(a)bigbrie.com
> > To unsubscribe send an email to lug-nuts-leave(a)bigbrie.com
> >
I don't really get on the upgrade treadmill. I've been running Firefox 84 on Fedora 23 or something for awhile. Its in a VM I had a system issue with the host and had to do a reinstall and upgraded to fc 36. Everything was fine, running my fc 23 VM's on a fc 36 host. I'm on a different VM, my "fun" VM as I write this, which also runs Firefox 84 on fc 23 with no problems. I'll upgrage at some point.
The VM with the issues is my "finance" VM. I use it for my credit cards and banking and all that. Banks started to complain about my Firefox 84, so I tried to upgrade to 113. It crashes. A lot. So, I built a new VM with fc 38. And installed Firefox 115. It crashes almost immediately. But I was able to get some forensics. Its complaining that it is sending a 64 bit code to a subsystem that "doesn't support it". Implying that there is a 32 bit library somewhere.
I sort of do need to log in to banks and all that. Any thoughs or suggestions? It seems really unlikely that there would be a 32 bit library somewhere.
Desktop browsers and Firefox are getting increasingly less mindshare. Is this just EOL thrashing?
Any thoughts?
As you may have guessed, the hardware is pretty old, but I don't see where that would be an issue with this.
-Gary
I laughed so hard!
Interview with an Emacs Enthusiast in 2023 [Colorized]
https://youtu.be/urcL86UpqZc
Brian
--
Brian Lavender
http://www.brie.com/brian/
"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other
way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies."
Professor C. A. R. Hoare
The 1980 Turing award lecture
I don't know if I posted my Stratux build. I flew with it to Novato two
months ago. The only thing is that the SDR radio was a little heavy in
the hub and affected the connection for the 978 MHz radio. You can see a
blog post of my build here.
https://brie.com/brian/blog/?p=238
I flew a Cessna 152 with it.
--
Brian Lavender
http://www.brie.com/brian/
"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other
way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies."
Professor C. A. R. Hoare
The 1980 Turing award lecture
Hi Folks,
If I am on a Windows workstation and I RDP to another Windows machine, then I have no problem. If I am on a Fedora workstation, then the RDP session fails with complaints about TLS. This raises the question, how is the Fedora workstation is supposed to be configured to participate in TLS authentication/encryption, and why is it not, and what do I do about it? How can this be tested?
--
Chris.
V:916.799.9461
F:916.974.0428
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: > Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?
Thanks for the idea. It looks interesting. SDL2 is available in my repo.
I found this on Stack Exchange:
SDL and GTK are quite different in the sense that SDL just tries to provide you with a drawing surface and device inputs. GTK provides you with a user interface toolkit, that is, it provides you with user interface elements such as scrollbars, push buttons and so on. GTK is also quite complex compared to SDL. So I'd definitely go with SDL here. C or C++.. That's a can of worms I'm not going to open
I also found comments that SDL is easier and lower level, which seem contradictory to me, but which is consistent with the Stack Exchange post. I only want to capture mouse events a la xdotool, so SDL might be just what I need.
I've found some tutorials that aren't Youtube videos, so I'll check it out.
-Gary
Think the easiest, smoothest path for that might be SDL.
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 11:03 AM Gary <saclug(a)garymcglinn.com> wrote:
> I'm thinking about writing a small app that uses mouse input. I could do
> it in Java pretty quickly, but I thought I would broaden my horizons and
> used GTK. I did something with Perl and GTK a very long time ago This
> time, I was thinking of using C. Maybe I'll explore C++ or Rust, but for
> such a small app, I think it is probably overkill. I never learned C++ and
> I'm wondering if I should invest in it or just learn Rust, That is
> probably for another day anyhow.
>
> My question is about GTK versions. Normally, I would just take the most
> recent version of GTK and go from there, but it seems like there are
> backwards compatibility issues. My devel system seems to have libraries
> for 2 and 3 at least. I just ran into a bunch of version incompatibility
> issues with XPRA. Am I going to have more that the usual amount of pain
> with GTK and should I pick a version other that 4? I am assuming I can
> just install 4 on the deployment system and it will happily live with the
> other versions.
>
> -Gary
>
