Hah thanks. Lies, damn lies and statistics.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 3:27 PM Joseph Menke <joseph.menke(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The source for the post is an X post in which the poster cites himself for the statistic
and hasn't actually published the study. Worth seeing the methodology before drawing
too many conclusions. I smell someone with an ideological axe to grind.
Watched this YouTuber's thoughts on it yesterday:
https://youtu.be/_a_Vz2ytVCQ?si=IovzQD1ezsgeJ2g_. Just a person with a camera, but she
hits a lot of the good reasons to be skeptical.
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 10:05 AM Linus Sphinx <sphinxtar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Actually, they have it upside down, I only appeared to be doing
> nothing, analysis is 90% of the job. Even a script of only two lines
> must be maintained. In any disaster the IQ hierarchy takes over and
> you find a half dozen guys looking over one guy's cube with two more
> researching and calling out answers to the questions. Sure they could
> probably cut that down to two guys but in IT the only way to move up
> is moving to another corp. or embed yourself so far into the machine
> it's blackmail by fear. Most corp. keep a bench at least two or even
> three deep just to cover their ass so they always have somebody to
> train the replacements for the piss poorly documented mess created by
> so much turnover. They'd rather pay some consultant's ludicrous rate
> than give their home grown people the six figure 100% paid wildcard
> health benefits and a 401k with matching contributions to keep them.
> _______________________________________________
> Lug-nuts mailing list -- lug-nuts(a)bigbrie.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to lug-nuts-leave(a)bigbrie.com